Ghanshyam @ Ghanshyam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15142 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-697 Year-2018 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== GHANSHYAM @ GHANSHYAM YADAV Son of Babunand Yadav Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S.- Bhatani, District - Deoria (Uttar Pradesh).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sunita Devi Wife of Ghanshyam Yadav Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.O.- Ghati, P.S.- Bhatani, District - Deoria (U. P.). At present daughter of Chandrabhan Yadav, Resident of Village - Sabaiya, P.S.- Vijaipur, District - Gopalganj.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramadhar Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15142 of 2021(2) dt.23-12-2021 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 697/18 (Trial No. 2230/19), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15142 of 2021(2) dt.23-12-2021 3/3 make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T