Ram Lachhan Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8463 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Ram Lachhan Rai and Anr Son of Late Basudeo Rai. 2.

Chhotelal Yadav, Son of Late Ram Sakal Rai. Both resident of VillageKharaka Tole, P.S. Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Collector, Sitamarhi.

3.

Anchal Adhikari, Nanpur, Anchal Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Pupri.

5.

The Anchal Adhikari, Manpur, Anchal Manpur District- Sitamarhi. 6.

Ramsagar Paswan, Son of Bhanjan Paswan, Resident of Village- Kharaka, P.S. Manpur, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, A.C. to S.C.19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present.

2. The present application has been filed for: for issuance of appropriate writ for setting aside the order dated 01-03-2017 passed by Hon'ble member Administrative the Bihar Land Tribunal where by and where under the Ld Tribunal has rejected the B.L.T. Case No. 24/17as not maintainable And/Or also for giving a order / direction to the respondents to delete the R.S.P. No.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8463 of 2017(4) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 1444 under Mauza Kharaka from the notification no. 11/94-95 dated 17.09.14 as the said notification relates with the land ceiling case No. 8/73-74 of one Ram Sakal Singh son of Ramsevak Singh who was not concerned with the land aforesaid but wrongly the respondents have made involve this land in the aforesaid notification.

3. Learned State Counsel submits that a perusal of the petition would show that the petitioner has preferred title suit no. 13 of 2010 which is pending before the learned Sub Judge I, Sitamarhi and as such, a frivolous writ petition has been filed.

4. Though on the said point, the writ petition is/was fit to be dismissed with cost, since no one has appeared, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U