Sachin Yadav @ Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4700 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-415 Year-2024 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== Sachin Yadav @ Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Kumar Yadav, S/O Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village-Sabhadra, P.S- Manjhi, Dist.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 415 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(6) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown bikers took away Rs. 2,00,000/- and mobile of the informant by intercepting him while he was returning to his home at Parsagarh.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, he was apprehended in Ekma P.S. Case No. 295 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4700 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026 2/2 2025 wherein he has given his confessional statement and in his confessional statement, he has confessed the guilt. It has further been submitted that save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against him. From perusal of the order of the learned trial Court it will transpire that the recovery of mobile was from the possession of the co-accused. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has also been submitted that no T.I.P. was conducted. Petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case in which he is on bail. He is languishing in judicial custody since 03.12.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 415 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T