Amit Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24994 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2015 Thana -SAKRI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Amit Kumar Yadav son of Dinesh Yadav Resident of Village - Bhagwanpur, Police Station - Saur Bazar, District - Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 401 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. During the course of check of the vehicles by the informant, S.I. Sanjay Kumar, Officer-in-charge of Sakri Police Station, one Bolero Pick-up bearing Registration No. BR -01006563 coming from NH 57 was caught hold along with the petitioner Amit Kumar Yadav. When the police demanded the papers of the vehicle he did not give any paper nor any satisfactory answer.

On behalf of the petitioner, it has been submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24994 of 2015 (2) dt.20-07-2015 2/2 He is in custody since 27.2.2015 and the charge sheet has been submitted in the case. Further, it is submitted that due to mistake of facts, he has been made accused in the present case. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the stolen vehicle has been recovered from the possession of this very petitioner. When papers were being asked in respect to the vehicle in question he did not produce any paper. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer is rejected.

However, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of the case within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Sudhir Singh, J) S.Pandey/- U T