Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9878 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2018 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar S/o Sri Ganesh Singh R/o Vill - Rampur Nausahan, P.S. - Industrial Area Hajipur, Dist. - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 172 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 09.04.2018 at about 17:00 hours, when the informant along with the other police personnel was on special drive, he received information that one Alto car bearing Registration No.JH-01K-1561 is parked in front of Hathiya Bagan under suspicious condition. It is alleged that when the said vehicle was searched, 40 kgs of ganja was recovered from the said vehicle.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9878 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 2/3

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent, committed no offence and has no criminal antecedent. It was further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR but has falsely been implicated as an afterthought and in collusion with police. It was next submitted that the name of the petitioner was disclosed by the co-accused Yugal Kishore Singh Naveen, which has no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. It was further submitted that neither the petitioner was arrested from the spot nor anything incriminating was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, rather the alleged ganja was recovered from the said Alto car. It was lastly submitted that no case under Sections 20, 22 of NDPS, Act is made out against the petitioner. On these grounds, prayed for privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in one more case which is not of similar nature. The petitioner is not the owner of the said car. The seized contraband is of commerical quantity.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on the record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9878 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 3/3 within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Patna in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 172 of 2018 subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Prakash/- U