Ved Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6463 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2018 Thana- BEUR District- Patna ====================================================== VED PRAKASH, aged about 32 years (Male) son of Yogendra Prasad @ Yogendra Kumar Singh R/o Jivrakhan Tola, Colony Goraiyasthan, P.SManer, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ghanshyam Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Beur P.S. Case No. 375/2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 25(1-b)a/26 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of one live cartridge from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 22.11.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6463 of 2019(2) dt.07-02-2019 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Incharge, A.C.J.M.- VIII, Patna in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 375/2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T