Kanhaiya Lal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3815 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2019 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== KANHAIYA LAL Son of Manoj Kumar Manohar Resident of Village - Arniya, P.S.- Jandaha, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2019 in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 210 of 2019 for the offence registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the first information report but subsequently, in the confessional statement made before the police by one Raja Kumar, the petitioner's name has been included and he has been remanded in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has not been placed on T.I. Parade.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3815 of 2020(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 210 of 2019, subject to the following conditions :-

1. One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.

2. The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

3. The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

4. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T