← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9337/2017dismissed

Rasda Sultana v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-09-07Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9337 of 2017 ====================================================== Rasda Sultana, wife of Md. Irfan, resident of Village- Manjhi Narpalia, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Saran, Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra. 4.

District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra.

5.

The District Education Officer, Saran, Chapra. 6.

District Programme Officer, Establishment, Saran, Chapra. 7.

Block Education Officer, Manjhi, District- Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suraj Narayan Yadav, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, A.C. to A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner has challenged her order of transfer, bearing Memo No.301 Chapra dated 22.05.2017, as contained in Annexure 11, by which the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra has transferred the petitioner to Middle School, Dumri (Manjhi) in the district of Saran. It has been submitted that the petitioner was functioning as Assistant Teacher in Hindi Primary School, Narpaliya Manjhi in the district of Saran since 1996, yet she is seeking to challenge her transfer having remained at a particular place for a

Patna High Court CWJC No.9337 of 2017(2) dt.07-09-2017 2/2 considerable length of time.

This Court after consideration of all facts and circumstances and hearing the learned counsel for the parties, does not find any merit in the writ application. The same, accordingly, stands dismissed.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U