Patna High CourtCR. REV./364/2016dismissed

Maisar Alam @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-03Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.364 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) =========================================================== Maisar Alam @ Chhotu S/o Haider Ali, resident of village- Madhopur Sheikh Toli Police Station- Turkaulia, District- East Chamaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-10-2016 This revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short 'the Act of 2000') has been filed against the order dated 04.03.2016 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari in Cr. Appeal (Juvenile) No. 17 of 2016 whereby he has dismissed the appeal preferred under Section 52 of the Act of 2000 against the order dated 08.02.2016 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Motihari in Trial No. 983 of 2015 whereby the bail application of the petitioner in connection with Madhuban P. S. Case No. 377 of 2015 registered under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.364 of 2016 dt.03-10-2016 2/2 Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act has been rejected.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

Regard being had to the involvement of the petitioner in at least three other cases under Sections 392, 395 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, I see no illegality in the impugned order dated 04.03.2016 passed by the appellate court. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

However, the Juvenile Justice Board, Motihari is directed to conclude the inquiry within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order failing which the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the Juvenile Justice Board itself.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U T