Ranjit Paswan @ Ranjith Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8934 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-507 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Ranjit Paswan @ Ranjith Paswan Son of Kali Paswan @ Babulal Paswan Resident of Village- Manjhauli, Murkata, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 507 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 387, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that co-accused Shrawan Chaudhary and Chulbul Pandey, made threatening calls to the informant and demanded ransom. On the alleged date and time of occurrence, 30-40 accused persons including the petitioner came at the informant's house and made indiscriminate firing.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8934 of 2025(2) dt.20-02-2025 2/3 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Petitioner never demanded any ransom and nor any ransom was paid to the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2024 and has four criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no specific allegation against the petitioner as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 507 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8934 of 2025(2) dt.20-02-2025 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T