Niranjan Rai @ Niranjan Yadav @ Phutto Yadav @ Phutto Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17262 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2016 Thana -BATH District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Niranjan Rai @ Niranjan Yadav @ Phutto Yadav @ Phutto Rai S/o Bhudeo Yadav@Bhudeo Rai Resident of Village- Bath, PS Bath, District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Bath P.S. Case No.21 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 384 & 386 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation has been made that while the informant was going to hospital he was intercepted by three miscreants and took away Rs.20,000/-. The petitioner has been identified by the informant.

In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17262 of 2016 (2) dt.28-04-2016 2/2 However, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within a period of six months from today. If the trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, the petitioner will have a liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U