Raj Kishore Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8062 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2024 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Raj Kishore Rai S/o- Bhuli Ray, R/o Village- Lala Tola, PS- Barhara, DistBhojpur. 2.
Shekhar Yadav @ Chandrashekhar Rai S/o- Bhuli Ray, R/o Village- Lala Tola, PS- Barhara, Dist- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have antecedents of two cases and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioners intercepted him and Shekhar assaulted him by sickel causing injury on hand while Munna assaulted Vikash by rod causing injury on head, thereafter Gautam assaulted Rajneesh by katta
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8062 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/3 causing injury on head and thereafter, Raj Kishore took out Rs. 21,630/- (Rupees twenty-one thousand six hundred and thirty only) from the pocket of the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case by the informant. It is further submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting, then from perusal of the injury report annexed at Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application, it would manifest that injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and on non-vital part of the body, except that of Guddu Singh, but then opinion with regard to his injury has been reserved, it is next submitted though opinion has been reserved, but the injury is on non-vital part of the body.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only) each with two sureties of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8062 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, where the case is pending / successor Court, in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 291 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shahnawaz/- U T