Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3651/2019dismissed

Ranjan Kumar @ Rajan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3651 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2018 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar @ Rajan Kumar Sri Vijah Sao @ Vijay Saw Resident of Village- Mohanganj, Barun, P.S. Barun, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Atul Chandra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 206 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 379, 411, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 4 and 40 of the Bihar Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1972 and 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986.

Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner is illegally loaded sand in five tractors were seized during the raid conducted by the informant along with other police officials and a seizure list has been prepared.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is the registered owner of the tractor and he has all the relevant documents regarding the vehicle and the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3651 of 2019(3) dt.04-02-2019 2/2 petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has falsely beem implicated in this case.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances as discussed above, the case of the petitioner is concerned, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, Accordingly, prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court, if possible on the same day.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T