← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2478/2019dismissed

Babita Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-11-30Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2478 of 2019 ====================================================== Babita Devi Ashok Kumar Das R/o- Vill- Madhodih, P.O.- Satanapur, P.S.- Ujiyarpur, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar and Ors through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Mass Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate, District- Samastipur. 6.

The District Education Officer, District Samastipur. 7.

The District Programme Officer, Sakcharta, District- Samastipur. 8.

The Block Education Officer, Block- Ujiyarpur, District- Samastipur. 9.

The Headmaster Upgraded Middle School Vill- Madhodih Block- Ujiyarpur, District- Samastipur.

10.

Shri Bindeshwar Ram R/o- Vill- Madhodih, Block- Ujiyarpur, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha (Gp27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-11-2023

1. Heard the parties.

2. When the matter was called out, learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer that the case may be adjourned for four weeks on the ground that the file is not being located in the office of the learned counsel for the petitioner. On 31.10.2023, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. On 22.11.2023, on the ground of illness of arguing counsel, adjournment was sought and the matter was adjourned for 30.11.2023. Today,

Patna High Court CWJC No.2478 of 2019(5) dt.30-11-2023 2/2 when the case is called out, a new plea is taken that the file is not being located.

3. This Court is of the impression that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this case, accordingly, the same is dismissed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U