← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/112/1991dismissed

Ram Nath Raut And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-08The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.112 of 1991 ======================================================

1. Sri Ram Nath Raut

2. Sri Sheo Nath Raut

3. Sri Shambhu Rai

4. Sri Mohan Rai

5. Dulia

6. Kharhi

7. Moti Rani, all are sons and daughters of late Kishundeo Rai

8. Most. Sanghore Kuer, widow of late Kishundeo Rai, all resident of village Shorhat, Majhawalia, P.S. Manjhi, P.O. Shorhat, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Additional Collector, Saran

2. The Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar'

3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Chapra, East Chapra

4. The Sub-divisional Officer, Saran, Chapra

5. Kitab Mian

6. Khalil Mian

7. Jalil Mian

8. Sahabuddin Mian, Nos. 5 to 8 are sons of late Pan Mohammad, resident of village Shorhat, P.O. Shorhat, Matia, P.S. Manji, Dist. Saran

9. Sri Umashankar Sinha, son

10. Smt. Janki Kuer, wife

11. Smt. Phulmati Devi, daughter

12. Smt. Bachhi Devi, daughter, all are sons, wife and daughters respectively of late Sri Siwhwanath Sinha, resident of villageShorhat, Manjhwalia, P.S. Shorhat, District- Saran ... ... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 08-11-2017 This application has been filed for restoration of MJC No. 828 of 1990 which was dismissed for non-appearance in the year 1991. The application was filed on 8.3.1991. Office has

Patna High Court MJC No.112 of 1991(3) dt.08-11-2017 2/2 pointed out various defects and in spite of repeated opportunities being granted since 1991, none has appeared and defects have also not been rectified. Today when the matter is taken up none has appeared.

We find that with the passage of time and now after more than 26 years, no case is made out for restoration of the application.

The application is, therefore, dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U