Md. Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 25407 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -84 Year- 2014 Thana -MAHESI District- EASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) =================================================== Md. Sonu Son of Md. Yunus Resident of Village - Naya Samadpura, P.S. - Mehsi, District - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar No. III, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Dr. Indiwar Kumari (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.

16.03.2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Considering the period of custody of the Petitioner in the present case and his brother, Md. Raza undertakes his responsibility, let the Petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Sri Rajeev Kumar-IV, Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Motihari, East Champaran or his successor in connection with Tr. No. No. 7501 of 2014 arising out of Mehsi P.S. Case No. 84 of 2014 subject to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25407 of 2015 (2) dt.16-03-2016 the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other bailor shall be the brother of the Petitioner namely Md. Raza. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T