← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6412/2026bail rejected

Deepak Kumar Das @ Dipak Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-04Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6412 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2025 Thana- SHIVAJINAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Das @ Dipak Kumar Das, Son of Shiv Das, R/o - Dasaut, P.SShivajinagar, District - Samastipur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Shivajinagar P.S. Case no.68 of 2025 registered under sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 352, 303(2) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have abused and assaulted the informant with a knife multiple times leading to grievous injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case due to village politics. The manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the F.I.R. There is an inordinate delay of 10 days in lodging of the F.I.R.. The petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6412 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R together with the contents of the injury report wherein the injury on the informant has been found to be grievous in nature, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T