Mostt. Shanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2604 of 2024 ====================================================== Mostt. Shanti Devi wife of Kishun Thakur resident of village - Mangrar, panchayat- Mohanpur, P.O. - Dighi, Police Station - Laxmipur, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its the Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The District Magistrate, Jamui 3.
The Superintendent of Police, Jamui 4.
The Officer in Charge, P.S.- Laxmipur, District- Jamui. 5.
The DG (Audit), Central Revenue, Indraprastha Estates, New Delhi - 02 6.
The IGP, Cobra, CRPF, New Delhi 7.
The DIGP (ADM), CRPF, New Delhi-110003 8.
The Commandant, 209 Cobra, CRPF, Khunti, Ranchi, Jharkhand 9.
9. The Deputy Inspector General of police, Mokamaghat, Patna (Bihar) - 803303 10.
Smt. Priya Kumari wife of late Rohit Kumar, village - Mangrar, PanchayatMohanpur, P.O. Dighi, Police Station - Laxmipur, District - Jamui ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Rajesh Kr. Sinha, AC to GP-23 For the Union of India :
Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 07-10-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1.(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ, commanding the respondents to pay the due amount to the petitioner and the Respondent No. 10 in the ratio of 50% each on the head of pension of
Patna High Court CWJC No.2604 of 2024(4) dt.07-10-2024 2/2 the deceased son of the petitioner.
(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ commanding the respondents to pay 50% of ₹ 80 lakhs to the petitioner, which has been paid to the respondent no.10, Priya Kumari by the insurance company, after entering into a compromise in Complaint Case No.
20/2019."
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing civil suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The writ petition stands disposed off.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U