Yogendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1750 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7816 of 2016 ====================================================== Yogendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Subh Dayal Singh Resident of Mohalla - Maranpur ( Devi Aasthan ), P.O. Chand chaura, P.S. Civil Lines, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Sri Rajesh Kumar Choudhary, son of not known, The Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandary & Fishries Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna
3. Sri Kumar Ravi, son of not known, The District Magistrate, Gaya
4. Dr. Chandrashekhar, son of not known, The District Animal Husbandry Officer, Gaya.
5. Sri Sanjeev Kumar, son of not known, The District Deputy Development Commissioner, Gaya
6. Sri Sanjeev Kumar, son of not known, The Block Development Officer, Gaya.
7. Sri Vijay Kumar Singh, son of not known, The Circle Officer, Gaya.
8. The Corporation Bank through its Branch Manager, Gaya.
9. Sri Rohit Kumar, son of not known, The Branch Manager, Corporation Bank, Gaya .... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Praveen, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Fakruddin Ali Ahmad, AC to AAG12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 21-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In the nature of the order that has been enclosed at Annexure- N, whereby the claim of the petitioner on being tested has been rejected and even though the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner but then the disposal of the grievance of the claim confirms the compliance of the direction of this Court passed on the writ petition, whereby a direction was given to the District Animal Husbandry Officer to consider the grievance of
Patna High Court MJC No.1750 of 2017 (4) dt.21-02-2018 the petitioner as regarding release of subsidy and to dispose of the same in accordance with law. The petitioner, if so aggrieved by the order, would be at liberty to question the same before an appropriate forum by filing an appropriate application but for the present no case for contempt is made out and the contempt application is accordingly disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J) Surendra/- U