Krishana Kumar Kamal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.117 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6791 of 2021 ====================================================== Krishana Kumar Kamal S/o Ramvilas Singh R/o Village- Rahimabad Tole, Nurachak, Ward No.-10, P.S.- N.H. Bangra, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna (Sri Amir Subahani).

2.

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. (Sri Anand Kishore).

3.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga (Sri Radhe Shyam Sah).

4.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur. (Sri Yogendra Singh). 5.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur (Sri Radhe Shyam Singh).

6.

The District Programme Officer, Samastipur. (Sri Nitya Nand Pandey). 7.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Samastipur. (Sri Nikesh Kumar). 8.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Samastipur. (Sri Aadesh Titarmare). 9.

The Block Development Officer, Tajpur, Samastipur. (Smt. Vandana Singh). 10.

The Circle Officer, Tajpur, Samastipur. (Smt. Rachna Singh). ... ... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

None.

For the State :

None.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 25-09-2023 None appears for the respective parties.

2. The present M.J.C. petition is filed for noncompliance of the order dated 13.09.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No.6791 of 2021. The directions of this Court is for submission of representation and, thereafter, the concerned authorities was

Patna High Court MJC No.117 of 2022(3) dt.25-09-2023 2/2 required to pass speaking order within a period of three months from the date of filing of representation read with opportunity of hearing to the petitioner

3. Perusal of show show cause read with documents, it is evident that orders of this Court read with the petitioner's representation, the concerned authority has taken a decision and to that effect order has been passed on 11.04.2022 and the same is part and parcel of the show cause.

4. Accordingly, the present M.J.C./Contempt Petition stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 11.04.2022 if it is disadvantage to the petitioner. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Arun Kumar Jha, J) P.S./-Manish U