Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4248/2020bail granted

Golu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-23Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4248 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2019 Thana- BALUA BAZAR District- Supaul ====================================================== GOLU RAM Son of Devan Ram Resident of Village- Matiyari, P.S.- Balua Bazar, Distt- Supaul ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302/120B/34 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on suspicion due to previous enmity with the informant. He submits that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and in fact the deceased died of road accident. Nothing incriminating has come against the petitioner during investigation to connect him with the offence. Petitioner is in custody since 3.9.2019.Charge sheet has also been filed in the case, as such, there is no chance of tempering with the evidence.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge III, Supul in Sessions Trial No. 382/2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4248 of 2020(2) dt.23-01-2020 2/2 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T