Patna High CourtCWJC/9099/2017dismissed

Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-31The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9099 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Rajeev Kumar Son of Shailendra Singh Resident of Village- Khutha Dih(West), Ward No. 8, Police Station- Barahiya, District Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education , Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai.

4. The District Education officer, Barahiya, District Lakhisarai

5. The Block Education Officer, Barahiya, District Lakhisarai.

6. The District Programme Officer, (Welfare), Lakhisarai, District lakhisarai.

7. The Child Development Project Officer, Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai.

8. The Circle Officer, Barahiya, District Lakhisarai.

9. The Block Development Officer, Barahiya, District Lakhisarai.

10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Khutha,(West) Barahiya, lakhisarai. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha- GA7 Ms. Priya Gupta, AC to GA-7 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 31-07-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

This Public Interest Litigation has been filed making grievance that an old building has been demolished in the area in question and a building for establishment of an Anganwari Centre is being constructed even though there are two Anganwari Centres in the same area.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9099 of 2017 dt.31-07-2017 2/2 Be that as it may, the question of construction of an Anganwari Centre after demolishing a building is governed by the policy decision and administrative decision by the Government. We are not inclined to go into the matter at the instance of the petitioner. The appeal is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 5.8.2017 Transmission Date N/A