← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5350/2025disposed

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-03Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5350 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-389 Year-2024 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

Ranjeet Kumar Son of Yogendra Gop @ Jagendra Yadav @ Yogendra Yadav @ Jogendra Yadav village- Charui par ps- Noorsarai, Dist- Nalanda 2.

Yogendra Gop @ Jagendra Yadav @ Yogendra Yadav @ Jogendra Yadav son of Late Yadu Yadav village- Charui par ps- Noorsarai, Dist- Nalanda 3.

Guddu Kumar Son of Yogendra Gop @ Jagendra Yadav @ Yogendra Yadav @ Jogendra Yadav village- Charui par PS- Noorsarai, Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2025 Petition for pre-arrest bail of petitioner no.2 has already been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 7.2.2025.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners no. 1 and 3 and the State.

3. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

4. As per the prosecution case, on secret information raid was conducted in the house of co-accused Pintu Kumar and on search one country made revolver was recovered from the house of co-accused Pintu Kumar.

5. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners have been made accused in this case only because they are brothers of said co-accused. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5350 of 2025(3) dt.03-03-2025 2/2

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of petitioners no. 1 and 3 is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Noorsarai Police Station Case No. 389 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T