← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6264/2026bail granted

Anish Raj @ Anish Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-04Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6264 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2024 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Anish Raj @ Anish Thakur S/O Dinesh Thakur R/O Village - Sahasraw, Police station- Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case no. 179 of 2024 registered under section 304 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that while he along with one another were returning on a motorcycle after having collected a total amount of Rs.82,900/-, two accused persons asked them to stop their motorcycle and having snatched the bag containing the cash, escaped.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation on the basis of a confessional statement of the petitioner made before police in one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6264 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 another case. The cause of false implication of the petitioner are his antecedents. Neither any incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession nor has the petitioner been put on T.I. parade inspite of being in custody since 2.9.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner being in custody since 2.9.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case no. 179 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bagaha, West Champaran. (Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T