Santosh Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4247 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2018 Thana- KUSHESHWARASTHAN DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== SANTOSH CHAUPAL son of Bino Chaupal, Resident of village- Samaila, P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, District-Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2019 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kusheshwar AsthanP.S.Case No.134of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323,504, 447, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he had kept iron rod in the field of the informant and when he protested he assaulted by iron rod to the informant causing injury to his head. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the injury is simple in nature and though he is accused in four other cases but those are old cases instituted during the year, 2007-2014.
Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4247 of 2019(3) dt.22-02-2019 2/2 informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the injury is on the head..
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., Biraul District Darbhanga in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S.Case No.134 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T