Sudhir Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8085 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2023 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sudhir Ray (Male) aged about 35 years, S/o Binda Ray R/o Vill - Tersiya, Ward no. 08, P.S. - Ganga Bridge, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Gangabridge P.S Case No. 207 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 480 litres of countrymade liquor was recovered from a Vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the petition and he is in judicial custody since
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8085 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/2 21.09.2023.
5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail after framing of the charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1cum- Additional District and Session Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in the connection with Gangabridge P.S Case No. 207 of 2023.
7. However, the court below is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of this order. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/ Brajesh/- U T