← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/165/2026disposed

Mahendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Arvind Kumar, The Additional Chief Secretary

2026-04-03Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.165 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13712 of 2025 ====================================================== Mahendra Paswan Son of Late Rambilsh Paswan, Resident of VillagePorsanda, P.O.- Momindpur, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda, and previously working as In-charge Keyman-cum-Chaukidar at P.H. Division, Hilsa, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Arvind Kumar, the Additional Chief Secretary Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Arvind Kumar, The Additional Chief Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Sri Nityanand Prasad, The Engineer In-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.

4.

Sri Dinesh Kumar, The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Patna Division, Patna.

5.

Sri Ravi Prakash, The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, P.H. Division, Hilsa, Nalanda.

6.

Sri Hautinlal Suantak, The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Additional Advocate General 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-04-2026 Heard the parties concerned.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order under contempt, the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of rejecting the claim of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for a

Patna High Court MJC No.165 of 2026(4) dt.03-04-2026 2/2 liberty to challenge the same at an appropriate forum.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same before the appropriate forum by filing an appropriate representation, if so advised.

(Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U