Arun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6933 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-494 Year-2018 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Arun Yadav, aged about 38 years (Male), Son of Late Basudeo Yadav, resident of village- Mirjawa, Ward No.-09, P.S. Triveniganj, District-Supaul. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Pronoti Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 1063.4 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 1063.4 liters wine is recovered from the Pick-up Van and cowshed in question. The said Pick-up Van and cowshed does not belong to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of disclosure

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6933 of 2019(2) dt.06-02-2019 2/2 made by co-accused Singheshwar Sah and Vikash Kumar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Supaul, in connection with S.T. (Excise) Case No. 1/2019, arising out of Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 494 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T