Ram Akwal Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8035 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2366 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== 1.

RAM AKWAL CHAUHAN SON OF KARU CHAUHAN R/O VILLAGEJOTA TOLA MANKA, P.S.- ATRI, DISTRICT- GAYA 2.

RAM CHANDRA CHAUHAN SON OF KARU CHAUHAN R/O VILLAGE- JOTA TOLA MANKA, P.S.- ATRI, DISTRICT- GAYA 3.

KARU CHAUHAN SON OF LATE CHHATHU CHAUHAN R/O VILLAGE- JOTA TOLA MANKA, P.S.- ATRI, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 341, 323, 354(B), 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8035 of 2022(3) dt.26-09-2022 2/3 Allegedly, the petitioners along with other accused persons assaulted the informant and her husband by means of several weapons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. They has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The police has submitted final form against the petitioner after investigation, but differing with the same, court below has taken cognizance against the petitioners. Petitioner no.1 has one criminal antecedent and petitioner no.2 and 3 have no criminal history.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8035 of 2022(3) dt.26-09-2022 3/3 Court in Complaint Case No.2366 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T