Arvind Mahto @ Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Mahto @ Arvind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5132 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2025 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Arvind Mahto @ Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Mahto @ Arvind, S/O Baijnath Mahto, R/O Vill.- Cheriyabariyarpur, P.S.- Cheriyabariyarpur, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Cheriyabariyarpur P.S. Case No.131 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others arrived at the house of the informant while the husband of the informant was sleeping and it is alleged that the petitioner has assaulted with khanti on the head of the informant's husband due to which he received bleeding head injury

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5132 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the occurrence is of 14.08.2025 whereas the F.I.R. has been lodged on 16.08.2025. There is delay of two days and delay is not explained. It has also been submitted that there is allegation against the petitioner is that of assaulting the informant's husband with khanti but there is no repetition of blow, this shows that the petitioner was not having the intention to kill otherwise he may have given other blows. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 14.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that from perusal of the order of the learned trial court, it transpire that learned trial Court has recorded that the injury caused to husband of the informant is grievous in nature and the CT Scan report shows fracture of right temporo-frontal bones.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5132 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Manjhaul (Begusarai) in connection with Cheriyabariyarpur P.S. Case No.131 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T