Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4726 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2025 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rahul Kumar S/O Sunil Rai R/O Vill.- Narepur, P.S.- Bachhwara, Dist.- Begusarai, at Present Madhurapur Bichala Tola Ward no. 27, P.S.- Teghra, Dist.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anish Chandra, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Amritesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others arrived at the house of the informant; started assaulting and made firing. The informant anyhow managed to escape. It is further alleged that the informant called Teghra P.S. and on this the accused persons fled away taking Rs.1,500/- from the pocket of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is also a counter version of this case. It has further been submitted that in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4726 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026 2/2 counter version, the accused side has received injuries. In this case there is only allegation that accused persons have made fire and that allegation is general and omnibus. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that as far as recovery of the cartridges is concerned, that is not recovered by the police rather that was presented to the police by informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has lastly submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 27.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T