Mahant Awadh Bihari Das v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No 806 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Mahant Awadh Bihari Das Chela of Swami Sri Ram Kishore Das, Sadhak Chela of Late Ramdeo Das, Resident of K-56/33 Ashwar Gangi, Awasanganj, Varanasi U.P. , at Present Mahanth Chinta Manchak, Harinamchak Poksi, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2.
The District Magistrate, Patna.
3.
The District Level Security Committee, District Patna through District Magistrate, Patna and its Member, Patna, Bihar 4.
The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.
6.
The Superintendent of Police (Rural) Patna.
7.
The Officer-In-Charge, Police Station, Mokama Patna. 8.
The Officer-In-Charge, Ghoshwari Police Station, District- Patna. 9.
The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Barh.
10.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Barh, 11.
The Circle Officer Ghoshwari District Patna.
12.
Sri Swaraj Kumar Singh @ Madan Singh, Son of Late Shashi Shekhar Prasad Singh.
13.
Rajiv Singh @ Jhulo Singh, Son of Dhurub Singh, Both Residents of Village- Chintaman Chak , P.S.- Mokama , District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr P N Sharma, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
This application has been filed seeking a direction for
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.806 of 2017(2) dt.10-01-2020 2/2 grant of protection to the petitioner.
Counter affidavit was filed way back on 28.07.2017 after due service upon petitioner's counsel. In paragraph 11 of the counter affidavit filed by the Additional Superintendent of Police, Barh, there is specific averment that in the District Level Security Committee, petitioner's application for protection has been considered and proper direction has been given to keep strict vigil on the situation to avoid any untoward incident. There is specific assertion that strict vigil is being kept from the level of Police Station for protection of life and property of the petitioner by the Police Patrolling Party. The averments made in the counter affidavit have neither been denied nor disputed by filing any rejoinder.
In view of the fact that the District Level Security Committee has taken the steps, no further direction is required to be given in the instant application.
This application is dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U T