Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14682 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1303 Year- 2014 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Singh Son of Rajeshwar Singh, Resident of Village -Hathini, P.S. NOkha, District - Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.21951 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1303 Year- 2014 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Pinku Singh @ Pinku Kumar Singh. S/o Wakil Singh. Resident of village - Hathini, P.S.- Nokha, District - Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.14682 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Nandan Sahay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.K. Choudhary (App) (In Cr.Misc. No.21951 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 01-06-2015 Both these applications arise out of Sasaram ( Muffasil) P.S.Case No. 1303 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 458,384,386,506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and as such, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

It is submitted that petitioners have not been named in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14682 of 2015 (2) dt.01-06-2015 2/2 the first information report but their name has appeared during investigation in the statements of the witnesses .There is allegation of demanding ransom against the petitioners, but no money has been given by the informant to anyone.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sasaram ( Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 1303 of 2014 with the following conditions :

1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioners.

2.

The petitioners will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioners will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Namita/- U T