Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15355/2024dismissed

Jay Deo Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-24Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15355 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-571 Year-2022 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Jay Deo Tiwari Son of Late Sitaram Tiwari R/o vill - Mathurapur, P.S. - Jagdishpur, Distt. - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Gajadhar Yadav Son of Late Devan Yadav R/o vill - Ghagha, P.S. - Bihiya, Distt. - Bhojpur 3.

Kamal Yadav @ Kamta Yadav Son of Gajadhar Yadav R/o vill - Ghagha, P.S. - Bihiya, Distt. - Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jiwan Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. This is an application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3 vide order dated 09.02.2023 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge-18, Bhojpur at Ara in A.B.P. No. 55 of 2023, arising out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 571 of 2022 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 120(B), and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials available on record, this Court finds that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15355 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that Opposite Party No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail or violated any of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.

4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.

5. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order. The learned Trial Court shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period.

6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U