← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7623/2017withdrawn

Ram Naresh Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-04-16Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7623 of 2017 ====================================================== Ram Naresh Singh Son of Late Shiv Nandan Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.- Rahimapur, P.S. and Anchal Bidupur, District Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Pramandal/ Division, Muzaffarpur. 3.

The Additional Collector, Hazipur at Vaishali. 4.

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Hazipur at Vaishali. 5.

Parichan Singh, Son of Sri Kishun Singh, deceased, Resident of Village and P.O. Rahimapur, P.S. andAnchal Bidupur, District Vaishali. 6.

Bhultani Devi, Wife of Ram Bhajan Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. Sahdullahpur, P.S. Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali at Hazipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy-Gp18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 16-04-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief:

"for quashing the order dated 30th September, 2016 passed by the Bihar Land Tribunal (Shortly put as B.L.T.) in Patna in B.L.T. Case No. 742/2015 under which the learned Chairman of the B.L.T. (Bihar Land Tribunal) dismissed the application filed by the petitioner by holding the land is not agricultural rather

Patna High Court CWJC No.7623 of 2017(3) dt.16-04-2025 2/2 homestead, order by committing an error of record and law affirming the order passed in revision in view of the facts and circumstances stated hereunder."

3. Mr. Saurabh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner in the presence of learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is no more and as such, the petition now becomes infructuous, in that background, he may be permitted to withdraw the case.

4. Permission accorded.

5. The present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U