Chandra Shekhar Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8196 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Chandra Shekhar Kumar Son of Bhikhari Mahto Resident of VillageRajwara Beerata, Post- Musahaniya, P.S.- Sonbarasa, DistrictSitamarhi.

2. Raj Kumar Singh Son of lal Chand Yadav resident of VillagePanchhor, P.O. and P.S. Riga, District- Sitamarhi.

3. Madhu Kumari Daughter of Radhe Prasad Keshri Resident of VillageMaheshkhunt English, P.O. and P.S. Maheshkhunt District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director Agriculture, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Deputy Director of Agriculture(Administration), Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Agriculture Production Commission,Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7. The District Agriculture Officer, Madhubani, District- Madhubani.

8. The District Agriculture Officer, Khagaria, District- Khagaria.

9. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Chairman, the Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College Compound, P.O. - B.V. College, Patna.

10. The Chairman, the Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College Compound,P.O. B.V. College, Patna.

11. The Secretary, the Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College Compound,P.O. B.V. College, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Chitranjan Sinha(PAAG 2) Mrs. Ratna Kumari, AC to PAAG 2 For the BSSC : Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundarm ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-04-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the present writ petition has now become infructuous and the

Patna High Court CWJC No.8196 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2018 2/2 petitioners do not want to press this writ petition. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with a liberty to the petitioners to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law, in case any fresh cause of action arises.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U