Amit Mahto @ Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8897 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2019 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

AMIT MAHTO @ AMIT KUMAR S/o Raj Kumar Mahto R/o VillageFulwariya, P.S. - Fulwariya, Distt. - Begusarai. 2.

Sujit Mahto S/o Raj Kumar Mahto R/o Village - Fatehpur, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Gogri, Distt- Khagaria.

3.

Raj Kumar Mahto S/o Shankar Mahto R/o Village - Fatehpur, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Gogri, Distt- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have antecedent of one case.

The informant alleges that the accused persons including the petitioners came and Raj Kumar Mahto assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on his head thereafter Amit Kumar assaulted by a glass bottle causing injury on his cheeks and thereafter all the accused persons assaulted and when he raised alarm the neighbours came and took him to the hospital for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8897 of 2023(2) dt.20-06-2023 2/2 treatment.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the occurrence took place on account of dispute relating to land. It is further submitted that from perusal of Annexure-3 to the anticipatory bail application, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 179 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T