Praveen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8097 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Praveen Kumar Son of late Ram Surat Ram Resident of Village- Bhabua, Ward No. 2, Near Sudama Devi Girl's College, Post Office & Police Station- Bhabhua- Kaimur (Bhabhua) .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Kaimur.

5. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment) Kaimur.

6. The Block Education Officer, Usri Block, Kaimur.

7. The Block Development Officer Cum Secretary, Usri Block, Kaimur.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Unit Usri Block, DistrictKaimur.

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Unit Usri Block , District- Kaimur.

10. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority through its Secretary, Kaimur .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : M/S Rajeev Shekhar & Sanjeev Kumar, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, AC to SC XXVIII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 15-02-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the State.

Learned counsel appearing for the State with reference to paragraph 10 of the counter affidavit submits that the respondents are taking steps for redressal of the grievance of the petitioners. Paragraph 10 of the counter affidavit is as follows : "10 : That in view of the matter the petitioner will be paid within a period of two months after completing all necessary formalities."

Patna High Court CWJC No.8097 of 2017 (3) dt.15-02-2018 2/2 In view of the specific stand, the writ petition is disposed of on the undertaking of the respondents, contained in paragraph 10 quoted here-in-above.

In case the petitioners have any further grievance after the payment as assured in paragraph 10, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to file representation before the respondent no. 6 to raise the grievance with regard to error in calculation or if the petitioners is not satisfied with the payment made by the respondents on account of the fact that any of the entitlement has not been addressed. In case any representation is filed within a period of one month from the date of payment, respondent no. 6 shall be under obligation to dispose of the representation in accordance with law within two months and any further due is found to be given to the petitioners the same shall be paid within a further period of two months from the date of such decision.

With the aforesaid observations, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) SA/- U