← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16297/2021bail granted

Nabi Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-22Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16297 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2020 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

NABI MIAN S/O JALIL MIAN R/O VILLAGE- MOHANADIH, P.O RAJAUN P.S CHARKAPATHER DISRICT-JAMUI.

2.

KANIJA KHATOON W/O NABI MIAN R/O VILLAGE- MOHANADIH, P.O RAJAUN P.S CHARKAPATHER DISRICT-JAMUI.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Opposite Party No. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners are expected to honour their undertaking to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sona (Charkapathar) P.S. Case No. for the offence registered under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of dowry death due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16297 of 2021(2) dt.22-12-2021 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners being the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased have falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the petitioners are living seperately from the deceased and her husband. They have no concern with the deceased and her husband. It is further submitted that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody in connection with the present case. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the informant and the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui in connection with Sono (Charkapathar) P.S. Case No. 190 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Jagdish/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16297 of 2021(2) dt.22-12-2021 3/3 U T