← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6857/2023bail granted

Mahesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-03Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6857 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2022 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== MAHESH YADAV S/O RAMBAHADUR YADAV @ RAM BAHAL Resident of Village- Utapal, P.S.- Uska Bazar, District- Sidharth Nagar (U.P.). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ujjwal Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

This application is filed for grant of regular bail in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 206 of 2022 registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 which is pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge Excise Court No. 2, Motihari, East Champaran. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is recovery of 117 litre of foreign liquor and also the petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2022.

Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 6857 of 2023(2) dt.04-05-2023 2/2 bail.

Considering the period of custody, this application for regular bail is allowed.

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Court No. 2, Motihari, East Champaran. in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 206 of 2022. Since the petitioner is from Uttar Pradesh, the Court below is directed to verify the recent address of the petitioner before releasing him and one of the bailor should be blood relative of the petitioner and he shall be released after framing of charge.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Sunnykr/- U T