Priyanka Kumari v. The Bihar State University Service Commission

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1914 of 2025 ====================================================== Priyanka Kumari Daughter of Rameshwar Prasad, Wife of Dinesh Kumar Dinkar Resident of Village/Mohalla- Donar, Post- Lalbag, Police StationTown, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar State University Service Commission through the Chairman, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Building, Budh Marg, Patna, Bihar- 800001.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna. 4.

The Director, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.

5.

The Chairman, Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Building, Buddha Marg, Patna. 6.

The Secretary, Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Building, Buddha Marg, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Tuhin Shankar, Advocate Mr. Gopal Kumar, Advocate Mr. Aditi Sahay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-02-2025 Heard Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Tuhin Shankar, learned counsel for the respondent/s.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is only concerned on account of inaction on the part of the respondents inasmuch as, they have not informed the petitioner about the result of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1914 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2025 2/2 objection, which he had filed online before 03.11.2024.

3. Considering the aforesaid submission and information on behalf of the petitioner, the competent authority of the Staff Selection Commission is directed to give requisite information relating to the objection filed on behalf of the petitioner forthwith.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U