Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4680 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2023 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav S/o Arun Yadav R/o Village- Amarpur, P.SKutumba, Dist- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aman Vishal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-03-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his sister used to go for coaching when on the way Vikash used to eve-tease her and also took her photographs and posted on social medial with obscene comments, which was objected by the informant and his side by complaining to the parents of Vikash, on account of which a dispute arose, next alleges that on 15.05.2023 his uncle after attending a wedding was going to attend nature's call and when he reached near

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4680 of 2026(2) dt.17-03-2026 2/3 Ajay's house, he was intercepted by seven named accused persons including the petitioner and they assaulted him by sharp edged weapon causing injury on head and also took away his chain.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant is not an eyewitness to the occurrence and the allegation of assault is also not specific. On query of the Court that whether petitioner is related to Vikash or not, on which, it has been asserted and submitted that petitioner is not related to Vikash.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4680 of 2026(2) dt.17-03-2026 3/3 with Kutumba P.S. Case No.128/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T