← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3814/2020dismissed

Deepanjali Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-30Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman,Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3814 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Deepanjali Devi W/o Niraj Kumar Resident of Purani Adalat Parav, P.O.- Ara, P.S.- Ara Town, Distt- Bhojpur.

2.

Mrs. Asha Devi W/o Ashok Kumar Resident of Purani Adalat Parav, P.O.- Ara, P.S.- Ara Town, Distt- Bhojpur.

3.

Mrs. Anita Devi W/o Binod Kumar Resident of Purani Adalat Parav, P.O.- Ara, P.S.- Ara Town, Distt- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Land Reform and Revenue Department, Patna, Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate Ara, Bhojpur.

3.

The District Sub- Registrar, Ara, Bhojpur.

4.

The District Certificate Officer, Ara, Bhojpur. 5.

The Chairman- Cum- Member Board of Revenue, Patna. 6.

The Office of Inspector Registration, Patna, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH) Date : 30-06-2022 The petitioners have filed the present application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notices issued to them under Section 7 of the Public Demand Recovery Act whereby each of them has been asked to pay Rs.2,46,718/- as public demand for deficit amount of stamp. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners admits that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.3814 of 2020 dt.30-06-2022 2/2 petitioners have appeared before the Certificate Officer and filed their objection under Section 9 of the Public Demand Recovery Act. He further admits that the matter is sub judice before the quasi judicial authority for final determination of the demand made from the petitioners.

3.

In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the present application under extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction. The application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) ( Dr. Anshuman, J) kanchan/- AFR/NAFR NA CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 04.07.2022 Transmission Date NA