Lalan Kumar Yadav @ Lalan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15876 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -383 Year- 2014 Thana -SOUR BAZAR (Patraghat O. P. ) District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Lalan Kumar Yadav @ Lalan Yadav Son of Nageshwar Prasad Yadav Resident of village - Bhajan Patti, Police Station - Sour Bazar ( O.P. Patraghat ), District - Saharsa .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.N.Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 03-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 and 411 of IPC. It is submitted that FIR was lodged against unknown. During investigation, the name of the petitioner has appeared in the confessional statement of co-accused Jitendra Yadav from whose possession the stolen motor-cycle has been recovered. It is submitted that prior to T. I. Parade the petitioner has been identified in the police station by the informant, later on T. I. Parade has been held and he has been identified. After investigation charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15876 of 2015 (2) dt.03-06-2015 2/2 no chance of tampering with the witnesses. The petitioner will cooperate in the trial. Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A. Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa/court concerned in Sour Bazar (Patraghat) P. S. Case No. 383 of 2014 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T