← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16194/2021bail granted

Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-07-30Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16194 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-741 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== PANKAJ KUMAR Son of Manu Singh Resident of Village - Mohalla - Gaurakshni, P.S.- Sasaram (T), Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 30-07-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove all the defects as pointed out by office within four weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No.741/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution story, the petitioner was apprehended by the informant on 10.11.2020 at about 2.00 am in the night while he was fleeing away from the roof of his house after committing theft. It is alleged that on enquiry the apprehended person disclosed his name as Pankaj Kumar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16194 of 2021(3) dt.30-07-2021 2/3 (petitioner) and on search from the possession of the petitioner two mobile phones were recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has otherwise no criminal antecedent and he is in custody in connection with this case since 11.11.2020.

Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the accusation, the petitioner has remained in custody in connection with this case since 11.11.2020 and he has otherwise no criminal antecedent, this Court directs that the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No.741/2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 437 (3) Cr.P.C. as under :

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16194 of 2021(3) dt.30-07-2021 3/3 (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter, (b) that such person shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected, and (c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.