Akhilesh @ Akhilesh Rai @ Golaia @ Golu Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26326 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2012 Thana -PATORI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Akhilesh @ Akhilesh Rai @ Golaia @ Golu Rai son of Nagina Rai, resident of village -Tara Dhamaun, PS-Shahpur Patory, DistrictSamastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar no. 3(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Patory P.S. Case No. 183 of 2012 registered for offence under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier this Court, vide order dated 15th October 2014 in Cr. Misc. No. 24890 of 2014, rejected the bail of the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 16th May 2013 as has been mentioned in paragraph 10 of this application.
In such view of the matter, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26326 of 2015 (2) dt.24-06-2015 2/2 connection with Patory P.S. Case No. 183 of 2012, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U