Arun Bind @ Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4999 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2025 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.
Arun Bind @ Arun Kumar S/O Bhuneshwar Bind @ Bhuvneshwar Bind Resident of Village - Pildauri, Bind Tola, P.S. - Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur 2.
Saroj Kumar @ Pokcha Bind S/O Vimal Bind Resident of Village - Pildauri, Bind Tola, P.S. - Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gun Sagar Mahto, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No.295 of 2025 lodged on 23.07.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against four named accused persons including the present petitioners with allegation that they used to put pressure on the cousin of the informant. On 17.07.2025 and again on 21.07.2025, the allegation of assault by the petitioners are there along with other accused persons due to which injury has been caused to the informant.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4999 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Counsel also submits that both parties are resident of same village and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The specific allegation has been made against one accused, namely, Diwana Bind, who has assaulted the informant by iron rod due to which bleeding started.
5. It is the specific pleading of the counsel for the petitioner that the said accused Diwana Bind has been granted bail from the Lower Court. He further submits that actually, there is business dispute of selling flower between the parties and due to this reason, occurrence took place between them.
6. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioners is clean and they are ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon them.
7. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that about the statement of Diwana Bind, nothing has come either in the order sheet or in the pleading, against the petitioners, the allegation are general and omnibus.
8. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4999 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, only after being satisfied by the Trial court that the said accused Diwana Bind has been granted bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Bhagalpur in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No.295 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 with the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioners who shall provide official document to show their bona fide;
(ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bonds by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned police station every month for one year to mark attendance; (Dr. Anshuman, J) Prakashmani/- U T