Ramraj Yadav @ Punjabi Ji v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28169 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2013 Thana -ROSHANGAANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Ramraj Yadav @ Punjabi Ji Son of Bharat Yadav resident of Village Bishwarampur, P.s Imamganj, Dist- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 10-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 120B, 121, 122, 124A of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act, 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act and Sections 13, 16, 17, 18 and 20 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. The accused, who was arrested by the members of the combing operation and from whose possession one rifle, three cartridges and two mobile sets were recovered, has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. no. 7796 of 2014 (Annexure-3). The petitioner has been implicated in several cases as Bharat Yadav, father of the petitioner, filed Complaint Case no. 602 of 2012 against the officer-in-charge and other police officers of Imamganj Police Station. The petitioner has been in custody since

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28169 of 2015 (2) dt.10-08-2015 2 / 2 15.7.2014.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sherghati, Gaya, in Roshanganj (Banke Bazar) P.S. Case No. 47 of 2013 with the following conditions :

1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) sudip/- U T