Madhav Kumar @ Krishna Madhav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6762 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2021 Thana- HATHAURI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MADHAV KUMAR @ KRISHNA MADHAV KUMAR Son of Sri Sunil Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Narma, Pachhiyari Tola, P.S.- Hathauri, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 and 393 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons got the motor-cycle stopped the forcibly took out Rs.14,000/- from the pocket of the informant on the point of knife and they have also tried to snatch the motorcycle.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no any incriminating

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6762 of 2023(2) dt.11-04-2023 2/2 article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner in this case on mere disclosure of other co-accused person. He further submits that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail application and submitted that the allegation levelled as the petitioner is serious in nature. Hence, he does not deserve anticipatory bail.

Considering the arguments of the parties and perusal of the records, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 137 of 2021. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T