Ankit Yadav @ Milka @ Ankit Kumar Aditya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5227 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2021 Thana- KAJRAILICHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ankit Yadav @ Milka @ Ankit Kumar Aditya, S/O Manish @ Mahesh Prasad Yadav R/O Village- Kelapur Kajraili, P.S.- Kajraili, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 29.03.2021, when he was returning to his home along with his brother-in-law when he was intercepted by the accused persons including the petitioner and it is alleged that this petitioner fired at the informant, but missed, but his brotherin-law received the gunshot injury on hand. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5227 of 2022(2) dt.18-08-2022 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that no motive has been assigned for the occurrence. It is further submitted that the informant alleges that several accused persons were present at the place of occurrence who fired.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that there is a direct allegation against this petitioner of firing and brother-in-law of the informant received gunshot injury on hand and though it is on non-vital part of the body, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T